![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
****JavaScript based drop down DHTML menu generated by NavStudio. (OpenCube Inc. - http://www.opencube.com)****
|
| The Devin Brown Travesty | |||
| I am so ashamed for the Los Angeles Police Commission. Admittedly, I have no idea of whom this commission is comprised, or why it was created. But never can I remember seeing such blatant disregard for the plight of the little guy by ‘The Man’. They sit in judgment, with the clarity of hindsight and the convenience of months, and condemn an LAPD officer for a choice he had to make in approximately 1.7 seconds of who was going to die that day. A year ago, almost to the day, a 13 year old boy, high on marijuana, stole a 1990 Camry, and used it to lead LAPD on a chase through residential neighborhoods, with a passenger in the car, before finally crashing and turning the car on the police. The LA Police Commission is on the side of the kid. |
![]() The radio Officer Garcia was using moments before the collision can be seen dangling below the mangled door of the cruiser. The stolen Camry used by Devin Brown to cause this damage can be seen to the left. |
||
|
These are the facts. |
|||
|
Devin Brown, thirteen years old and high on pot, stole a Camry in the middle of the night, and, with officers already on the way for the reported theft, ran a red light in it and attracted other officers. These other officers were in pursuit before the report had even been entered into the police database. They followed the car onto the freeway and tried to pull him over. Fact 1: 03:49:00 – Broadcast by officers that they were attempting to stop the vehicle and then in pursuit of possible DUI vehicle. Instead, he exited the freeway into an area he was familiar with, thinking his familiarity would help him evade the police. These other officers, Grant and Garcia, radioed the situation and position, and the officers who took the GTA report joined the pursuit. The kid loses control of the car, trying to negotiate a turn at 40-50 mph, and runs it into an iron fence. These are actual excerpts from the DA’s report of the events that follows in the next seconds: “After [the passenger] fled the Toyota, Devin B. revved the engine loudly, and then shifted into reverse. The car’s tires squealed as the car gained traction and Devin B. rapidly drove the Toyota in reverse toward Officers Grant and Garcia and their car. As the Toyota accelerated toward the officers, the open passenger door struck a traffic signal pole on the sidewalk. The force caused the door to be pushed beyond the normal hinge range, striking the right front tire and leaving a tire imprint on the passenger door. The door sprang back and remained in an open position at a right angle to the car itself. The Toyota continued accelerating in reverse towards Officer Garcia flushing him from his position of cover behind his door. The Toyota then crashed into Officers Grant and Garcia’s police cruiser. Fact 2: Test runs where the tires broke traction establish a 1.7 to 2.0 second window of time from the point the Toyota’s tires broke traction to the collision with the patrol car. The shots were fired from within 12 feet. The Toyota’s left rear bumper struck the police cruiser’s right front quarter panel and front passenger door. The Toyota impacted Officer Garcia’s open passenger door slamming it closed. The Toyota continued scraping along the length of the patrol car placing Officer Garcia in the path of the oncoming Toyota. Officer Garcia continued moving away from the Toyota and its open door. Officer Grant told detectives that as the Toyota struck the police car, Officer Garcia was forced from his position of cover and began firing at the Toyota. Before they could reach a position of safety behind their car, Officer Winstanley heard the Toyota’s engine revving loudly, tires screeching, a collision, and shots fired. Officer Winstanley related that the shooting stopped before he saw the Toyota come to a stop. Neither Officer Ehrenburg nor Officer Winstanley reported hearing a break or pause in the firing sequence. Officer Grant said the Toyota ended up where Officer Garcia had been standing.” Fact 3: 03:53:30 – Broadcasts that a traffic crash has occurred and simultaneously shouts that shots have been fired and requests help. Officer Grant, in fear for her life, dives out of the way of the Camry, to the opposite side of the police cruiser. The Camry hit the cruiser with such force that there was glass lodged in her uniform, from the far side of the vehicle. Fact 4: At pursuit termination, subject’s vehicle lays down 102’ of skid at an estimated speed of 40 to 50 mph. “Miles Carthron was traveling westbound on 83rd Street approaching Western Avenue driving to work when he noticed a Toyota on the sidewalk and a patrol car stopped behind it. Mr. Carthron stopped his car in the middle of 83rd Street approximately three to four car lengths from Officer Grant and Garcia’s patrol vehicle. Mr. Carthron said, “[t]he car was moving so fast – the car was moving so fast it had already hit the car, and that’s when he started shooting … that was a spilt-second decision.” He described Officer Garcia’s position “like he was sandwiched in …” Mr. Carthron summarized, “[i]f that police (Officer Garcia) hadn’t jumped out, he would’ve been hit.” The family of the victim, the NAACP, the media…all those normally opposed to the government and the public sector in general, like to call the boy a “baby” and say that he was “unarmed”.
In California in 2003 (the most recent data available) vehicular fatalities, including occupants and pedestrians, totaled 2,579—three quarters of the total non-self-inflicted firearm fatalities (3,467). That is a significant amount. Shame on anyone who would claim Devin Brown was unarmed. He was using deadly force, unconventional weapon or no. With or without a gun, he was wielding a weapon, and he was aiming at it Officer Garcia. Bob Baker, president of the Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union that represents about 9,100 LAPD officers: "Vehicles used as weapons have killed over 20 officers in the past four years.” Fact 5: Penal Code §§ 692-694 specifically authorize any individual protecting himself or another to use all force which he believes reasonably necessary and which would appear to a reasonable person, in the same or similar circumstances, to be necessary to prevent the injury which appears to be imminent. The use of deadly force in self-defense or in defense of others is considered justifiable if the person claiming the right to use self-defense actually and reasonably believed that he or the person being defended is in imminent danger of death or great bodily injury. Fact 6: Where the peril is swift and imminent and the necessity for action immediate, the law does not weigh into nice scales the conduct of the assailed and say he shall not be justified in killing because he might have resorted to other means to secure his safety. People v. Collins (1961) 189 Cal.App.2d 575 If you see any of the news stories, read any of the news articles, about this, you will hear about the family and the community talking about what an outrage this is, about how the injustice has to stop, about the racist corruption of LAPD, that they could allow something like this to happen…in other words, laying all the blame on the police. And people the world over like to talk about how pot doesn’t really affect your driving, or that it even makes you a better driver, that marijuana doesn’t cause accidents—and I guarantee you, people who wouldn’t otherwise care one way or the other will be incensed and activated by this, only because the kid was high on pot and they will defend to the death their right to be druggies, cling to every little thing that insinuates pot isn’t as bad as people think. Here are some numbers they, and we, should take into consideration before they decide someone other than the kid was at fault, that it had nothing to do with pot, that it was all about racism, and all that crap:
The truth of the matter is, no matter what the NAACP would like us to think, it doesn’t matter. Devin Brown’s mother can call him a “baby” all she wants, her attorney can holler about injustice all he wants. The truth of the matter is—he was no innocent angel. He was on drugs, he was responsible for the theft and destruction of an automobile and other public and private property, he was driving dangerously fast and recklessly (which is the only reason Officer Garcia was involved with him at all) and he attempted to assault and/or kill an officer. The Rev. James Lawson, director of the local branch of the SCLC, said murders like Brown's occur four times a week in this country, "proof that lynching is still going on. This can be stopped, and it is up to us to make Devin Brown's death the last. The city council needs to just tell the police department to kill no more children." If his mama didn’t want him to get shot, she should have taught him better than to steal cars. She should have taught him better than to smoke pot. She should have taught him better than to drive under the influence. She should have taught him better than to evade and assault officers of the law. And what the hell was a 13 year old doing in the parking garage of some other apartment complex at 1-3am? In short, if she wanted her “baby”, she should have been a mama. She should have spent some time parenting. Next, she’ll sue the makers of Grand Theft Auto for their violent video game, she’ll sue the gangsta-wannabe rap stars the kid listened to for glorifying drugs and violence, she’ll sue the local television networks for putting violent shows on TV. It will never occur to her to blame herself for not spending more time with him. For not being a parent, not monitoring his activities. Oh, no. Couldn’t be. It must be that Officer Garcia is racist against blacks. She would never… her baby would never… it must be corrupt LAPD… yeah… I will use the conclusion of the D.A. as my own conclusion—I just don’t think I could say it any better. “In Graham v. Connor (1989) 490 U.S. 386, the United States Supreme Court held that the reasonableness of the force used “requires careful attention to the facts and circumstances” of the particular incident “including the severity of the crime at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others, and whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.” (Id., at 396) Further the Court stated, “[t]he “reasonableness” of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight.” (Id., at 397) Moreover, “[t]he calculus of reasonableness must embody allowance for the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments – in circumstances that are tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving – about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation.” (Id., at 397-398) Whether Devin B. intended to strike Officers Grant and Garcia or was merely attempting to flee from them will never be known but we cannot, as the United States Supreme Court cautioned, use 20/20 hindsight to second guess Officer Garcia’s decision to fire his weapon. The scientific tests conducted were, at best, inconclusive. And it would be improper to speculate as to those facts which could not be conclusively established. We must rely on the evidence before us. We cannot disprove that Officer Garcia was acting under an actual and reasonable belief in the need for self-defense and the defense of others.” http://da.co.la.ca.us/pdf/garciaois.pdf |
|||